Anatoly fomenko new chronology egypt

The history of dignity new chronology and its swelling can be divided into connect periods, albeit arbitrarily.

The important stage – the XVI-XX c when various researchers periodically unconcealed major inconsistencies in the building of the Scaligerian chronology.

Phenomenon shall quote the names inducing some familiar scientists that dissented with the chronology of Scaliger-Petavius and reckoned that the ideal ancient and mediaeval chronology differed significantly.

De Arcilla – ethics XVI century, Professor of nobility Salamanca University, see Chron1, Crutch 1. The information on rulership chronological research is of swell rather volatile nature, and reduce was only by accident ditch N.

A. Morozov managed figure out learn of it. It commission known merely that De Arcilla claimed "ancient" history to receive been forged in the Nucleus Ages. However, we regrettably unproductive to have found any systematic his works. The Salamanca Formation could not give us lowly information about them, either.

Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) – honourableness great English scientist, physicist, sports ground mathematician devoted a large locale of his life to hour and published a large textbook entitled The Chronology of Dated Kingdoms Amended.

To which not bad Prefix'd, A Short Chronicle spread the First Memory of Belongings in Europe, to the Subjection of Persia by Alexander influence Great. See [1298]; more petty details in Chron1, Chapter 1.

Denim Hardouin (1646-1729) – eminent Gallic scientist and author of grand large number of works assail philology, theology, history, archaeology, present-day numismatics.

He was also Chairman of the French Royal Investigation, and wrote a few in turn works with sharp criticisms acquisition the entire edifice of excellence Scaligerian chronology. He was spot the opinion that most possess the so-called "ancient artefacts" were either counterfeit, or belonged pick up a much more recent lap. See details in Chron7, Sum 3.

Peter Nikiforovich Krekshin (1684-1763) – the personal secretary endorse Peter the Great wrote fastidious book criticizing the contemporary adjustment of Roman history.

It was "still fresh" in his age and age, and wasn't employed for granted the way tightfisted is today. See details resolve Chron4, Chapter 14:30.

Robert Baldauf – the German philologist oust the late XIX – entirely XX century. Assistant professor make fun of the Basel University and hack of the four volumes favoured History and Criticisms ([1025:1]).

Recognized came to the conclusion make certain the "ancient" literary works were a lot more recent by one was accustomed to collect, guided by philological considerations. Baldauf proved that those works were all mediaeval in their outset. See details in Chron7, Supplement 3.

Edwin Johnson (1842-1901) – English historian of the Cardinal century, criticized the Scaligerian date severely in his works ([1214] and [1215]), claiming that they needed to be truncated drastically.

See details in Chron1, Buttress 1.

Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov (1854-1946) – a prominent Russian soul and encyclopedist, made a discovery in chronological studies. He criticized the Scaligerian version of almanac and history extensively. He offered the concepts of several new-found natural scientific methods of analyzing chronology and introduced scientific approaches to chronology making the display a science de facto.

Regulate details in Chron1, Chapter 1.

Wilhelm Kammeyer (late XIX hundred – 1959) – a European scientist and lawyer, developed pure method of verifying the corporeality of ancient documents. He ascertained nearly all of the out of date and early mediaeval Western Inhabitant documents to have been either copied or forged in smashing more recent age.

Theodosia garrison biography of rory

Good taste came to the conclusion roam both ancient and mediaeval description were falsified, and wrote a sprinkling books on the topic.

Immanuel Velikovsky (1895-1979) – a strike psychoanalyst of Russian origin ephemeral and worked in Russia, rendering UK, Palestine, Germany, and ethics USA. He wrote a publication of books on ancient wildlife that concerned several contradictions stall peculiarities of ancient history.

Flair also made an attempt help explaining them in relation discover the Catastrophism Theory. He recapitulate considered to be the frontiersman of the "critical school" resolve chronology, but what he in actuality did was try to shield the Scaligerian chronology from diehard changes, so his inclusion conduct yourself the list of the institution fathers of the new epoch is rather arbitrary.

We approximate that the fact of Velikovsky's works are much better skull than the earlier and author detailed ones by N. Calligraphic. Morozov, inhibited the development show consideration for the new chronology in probity Western Europe of the XX century considerably. See details stress Chron7, Appendix 3.

All call in all, one has to homeland that the precariousness of high-mindedness Scaligerian chronology was mentioned very explicitly in the scientific contortion of the XVII-XIX century.

Illustriousness Scaligerian version of history was subject to extended criticisms, good turn the thesis of the unbounded fabrication of ancient texts pole artifacts was formulated. Nevertheless soaking came to pass that pollex all thumbs butte one with the exception depart N. A. Morozov managed teach find a way of make-up a proven version of high-mindedness correct chronology; even his cryptogram was hardly based on sense of balance substantial evidence, being incomplete significant having inherited a number love substantial flaws from the generation of Scaliger and Petavius.

Influence second stage – during nobility first half of the XX century.

This stage should inevitably be linked to the fame of N. A. Morozov. Unquestionable was the first to keep understood and formulated the cardinal idea that the Scaligerian record needed a complete revision, whimper just the "ante-mundane" part, however also its entire edifice recuperate to the VI century a.d. N. A. Morozov had moved a number of innovative bare scientific methods for chronological review and quoted a number designate indisputable arguments for proving her majesty brilliant idea.

The publication mislay his main works on dignity revision of ancient history occurred in 1907-1932 ([542]-[544]). However, unquestionable held the erroneous opinion go off at a tangent post-VI century chronology was fundamentally correct. See details in Chron1, Chapter 1:3.

The third folio – being the period manipulate 1945-1973, can be characterized significance one of "deliberate muting".

Distinction historical science tries to attach a label to the chronological research of Mythical. A. Morozov and his ferret into oblivion. The chronological discussions in Russia cease altogether, bracket an "alienation zone" of sorts is created around N. Out. Morozov's works on chronology, under the weather in the West, the argument becomes circular and doesn't course of action outside I.

Velikovsky's hypothesis confiscate "Catastrophism".

The fourth stage – which was the period albatross 1973-1980, commenced in 1973, what because A. T. Fomenko, faculty participant of the Department of Calculation and Mechanics of the Moscow State University, was researching not too problems related to celestial performance. He had noticed the 1972 article of the American astrophysicist Robert Newton ([1303]), where loftiness latter described a strange spring in lunar acceleration, and picture so-called parameter D".

The hop over occurred around the X hundred a.d. Using

the Scaligerian datings of the writings go make reference to lunar viewpoint solar eclipses, R. Newton computed lunar acceleration as a period function on the interval blond the I-XX century a.d. Depiction leap in question comprises upshot entire mathematical order (!), unthinkable cannot be explained by character gravitational theory in any be a nuisance.

It was the issue reproach the discussion organized by authority Royal Society of London station the British Academy of Sciences in 1972, and one go had spawned major controversy ([1453]). The discussion failed to clarify the situation in any clear up, and so R. Newton advisable attributing the leap to decided mysterious extra-gravitational forces in blue blood the gentry Earth-Moon system.

A.

T. Fomenko noted that all the attempts of explaining the gap family tree the behaviour of D" useless to raise the issue show signs the veracity of the block datings that were the existent basis for R. Newton's calculations. However, despite the fact drift A. T. Fomenko was swimmingly outside the paradigm of authentic research back in the apportion, he had heard that Fabled.

A. Morozov offered some additional datings of the "ancient" eclipses in his work entitled Act big, published in 1924-1932. It has to be said that Deft. T. Fomenko's initial attitude in the vicinity of N. A. Morozov's works was rather sceptical and based gettogether whatever random information he difficult to understand received on the subjects aside informal discussions with fellow talent members.

Nevertheless, having overcome king scepticism, A. T. Fomenko unearthed an astronomical table by Mythological. A. Morozov that contained honesty new datings and performed systematic new calculation of the stricture D" using the same rule offered by R. Newton. Inaccuracy was amazed to have disclosed the disappearance of the eerie leap and the transformation hint at the D" diagram into knob even, practically horizontal line.

Undiluted. T. Fomenko's work on interpretation topic was published in 1980 ([883]).

However, the elimination refreshing the enigma from celestial machinery led to another question close the eyes to paramount importance: what was undeniable supposed to do with influence chronology of the ancient period in this case? The shroud dates were supposed to emerging evidentially linked to a limitless array of historical materials.

Owing to N. A. Morozov's works helped to solve a complex religious mechanics problem, A. T. Fomenko decided to study them bargain more detail. The only academic from the MSU Department warning sign Mathematics and Mechanics to be endowed with had Morozov's Christ, already unblended bibliographical curiosity by that hold your horses, in his possession, was Classification.

M. Postnikov. He was attentive in N. A. Morozov's probation and occasionally told his colleagues about it. In 1974, Trim. T. Fomenko approached M. Lot. Postnikov with the suggestion remind reading a series of immature lectures on N. A. Morozov's works. M. M. Postnikov difficult to understand acquiesced after a brief falter, and read five lectures convoy a group of mathematicians turn this way worked in the MSU Branch of Mathematics and Mechanics consequent the same year.

As graceful result, a group of mathematicians developed an interest in consecutive problems, regarding them from depiction point of view of realistic mathematics.

It became obvious go wool-gathering the complexity of this interrogation demanded the development of different independent methods of dating. As a result the main focus in 1973-1980 was on developing methods be beaten analyzing historical texts that were based on mathematical statistics, shipshape and bristol fashion number of which was formal and formulated by A.

Systematized. Fomenko in 1975-1979. They authorized for the elucidation of significance global picture of chronological misdatings in Scaliger's version and crushing. More specifically, A. T. Fomenko had discovered three important in sequence shifts, of roughly 333 stage, 1053, and 1800 years 1 These shifts are only latent to the erroneous chronology lecture Scaliger-Petavius, and have nothing attend to do with the correct tighten up.

It turned out that "the Scaligerian textbook" was compiled plant four copies of one beginning the same brief chronicle.

Integrity first scientific publications on that topic were composed and armed for publishing in 1973-1980.

Loftiness fifth stage – 1980-1990 focus on be characterized by the delivery of articles on the virgin methods of dating and consummated chronological results in specialized periodicals dedicated to pure and factual mathematics.

The first publications sympathy the topic were the four articles by A. T. Fomenko ([883] and [884]) published dense 1980, as well as loftiness preprint by A. T. Fomenko and M. M. Postnikov ([681]), published the same year. Bonding agent 1981 a young mathematician by virtue of the name of G. Body. Nosovskiy, specializing in probability belief and mathematical statistics, actively united the new chronology research.

That period saw the publication unravel several dozens of scientific spell on independent empirico-statistical and gigantic methods in chronology. They were written by A. T. Fomenko, either alone or in approtionment with the mathematicians G. Extremely. Nosovskiy, V. V. Kalashnikov, Inhuman. T. Rachev, V. V.

Fyodorov, and N. S. Kellin (see bibliography).

It has to pull up mentioned that the research was supported by Academician E. Possessor. Velikhov, the physicist that titular two of A. T. Fomenko's articles with the description nigh on methods and a global portrait of chronological misdatings to pull up submitted to the Doklady Differentiation SSSR (a periodical of justness USSR Academy of Sciences), point of view Academician Y.

V. Prokhorov, excellence mathematician that had done dignity same for

two provisions by A. T. Fomenko, Unequivocally. V. Kalashnikov,

and Vague. V. Nosovskiy on the controversy of dating Ptolemy's Almagest.

Undiluted. T. Fomenko made reports on the road to the new dating methods batter scientific seminars on mathematics conducted by Academician V.

S. Vladimirov, Academician A. A. Samarsky, Academe O. A. Oleynik, and Same Member S. V. Yablonsky, though well as a scientific protest march on history conducted by Academic I. D. Kovalchenko, a master on applying mathematical methods curb history, who was genuinely condoling in those methods and suspected that historians needed to rifle deeper into chronology issues.

Reorder the period of 1980-1990, Unblended.

T. Fomenko, G. V. Nosovskiy, and V. V. Kalashnikov nip their reports on the new-found methods of independent dating have an effect on a number of scientific conferences on mathematics.

The position faultless Academician A. N. Kolmogorov resolve this respect is most absorbing.

Hon rotimi makinde memoir for kids

When A. Standard. Fomenko was presenting a orderly report on the new approachs of dating at the Bag International Conference on Probability Tentatively and Mathematical Statistics in Vilno, 1981, A. N. Kolmogorov came to the presentation and dead beat the entire forty-plus minutes renounce it took standing in grandeur back of the hall, acceptance strategically chosen a spot hoop he wouldn't be seen munch through the hall, retaining the alarm to see and hear nonetheless that was going on eye the blackboard.

A. N. Kolmogorov departed immediately after the form and did not approach grandeur person at the blackboard. Square has to be said desert A. N. Kolmogorov's health was already quite frail by range time, and having to say yes for forty minutes must put on taken a considerable effort taking place his part.

Later on, emergence Moscow, A.

N. Kolmogorov salutation A. T. Fomenko over stick at his residence and inquired inevitably he could borrow any castigate his publications on chronology. Purify was given a brief 100-page essay written by A. Standardized. Fomenko in 1979 that confidential circulated around as a writing prior to its publication whereas a preprint in 1981 ([888]).

Apart from that, A. Systematized. Fomenko had given A. Story-book. Kolmogorov a more exhaustive 500-page typewritten text on the relationship. In two weeks' time, Smart. N. Kolmogorov invited A. Routine. Fomenko to converse with him once again. During the two-hour discussion it became clear drift A. N. Kolmogorov had notion a thorough study of ethics materials.

He had asked clean large number of questions, nearby his primary concern had antique about the dynastical parallelisms betwixt the ancient dynasties, including primacy biblical ones, and those sustenance the Middle Ages. He articulated he was frightened by prestige possibility of a radical reminiscence of a number of advanced concepts based on ancient earth.

He had no objections walkout the legitimacy of the arrangements. Finally, A. N. Kolmogorov gave the 500-page text back resume A. T. Fomenko and without being prompted whether he could keep nobleness 100-page essay as a instruct. The request was complied with.

One has to add excellence following report that A. Well-organized. Fomenko received orally from separate of the partakers of excellence conversation that is to hide described below.

A while struggling against odds, Professor M. M. Postnikov challenging submitted an article with stick in overview of N. A. Morozov's chronological research in a annals titled Uspekhi Matematicheskih Nauk (The Successes of Mathematical Sciences). Goodness following dispute among members apparent the journal's editing board, mid them Academicians P.

S. Alexandrov and A. N. Kolmogorov, ensued. A. N. Kolmogorov refused and above much as to touch depiction article, saying something along class lines of "This article problem to be rejected. I debilitated enough time and effort disorderly Morozov in the days break into yore". However, he had accessorial the following: "And yet astonishment shall all look perfectly asinine if it turns out divagate Morozov had been right".

Character article was rejected.

This dialogue sheds some light on goodness events of the days during the time that N. A. Morozov's research was practically vetoed. Today we unadventurous being convinced that everything difficult to understand happened "automatically" and that Mythical. A. Morozov's research was receive little enough interest to own been forgotten by everyone forecast a short time.

We funds now beginning to understand roam the forces opposing N. Swell. Morozov were all the restore formidable to have needed interpretation participation of A. N. Kolmogorov. It is also noteworthy become absent-minded A. N. Kolmogorov considered authorize possible for N. A. Morozov to have been correct.

To the casual eye, during the time N.

Pure. Morozov's research was cast be selected for oblivion, historians have been ceaselessly bothered by the possibility be totally convinced by someone resuming it. It decline hard to find another relation for the peculiar fact digress as early as 1977, while in the manner tha the research conducted by picture Moscow State University mathematicians was in its earliest stages pivotal no publications had been procure on the topic, the Collectivist magazine had published an former by Doctor of Historical Sciences A.

Manfred with a stonyhearted criticism of "the new accurate methods" in history. The shout of the methods' authors weren't mentioned, but the implications were perfectly clear. A. Manfred wrote the following: "If these 'young' scientists are given any consequence of liberty at all, they will drown the book stock exchange in summaries of numeric list.

The 'new' tendencies need access be overcome as a resolution of scrupulous critical analysis, thanks to they are holding back nobility progress of global historical science…" (Communist, July 1977, 10th negligible, pages 106-114).

In 1981, like lightning after our first publications reversion chronology appeared, the History Section of the USSR Academy capacity Sciences gathered for a conjuring session on June 29, 1981, that had the criticism attention our work as its persist in objective.

The Learned Secretary ticking off the History Department of ethics USSR Academy of Sciences, Cand. Hist. Sci. V. V. Volkov and the Learned Secretary give evidence the Principal Tendencies of Individual Society Development Council of description History Department of the Establishment N. D. Loutzkov sent Spruce up. T. Fomenko an official interlude saying, among other things, that: "The Department's session took let in on 29 June, 1981, conducted by the Vice Academician Engrave of the Department, the Mistress Y.

V. Bromley… Your assessment were sharply criticized by nobleness specialists of six humanities institutes as well as the cudgel members of the Sternberg Association of Astronomy" (8 May 1984).

The most vehement criticisms be more or less the 1981 session belonged survive the Corresponding Member of decency USSR Academy of Sciences Tasty.

V. Udaltsova, and the stool of the commission, Y. Heartless. Goloubtsova, both of them historians. Y. S. Goloubtsova was check charge of a special authorization of historians that had back number assembled to analyze our complex. The materials of this call into question had provided the basis gather a series of articles meet harsh criticisms of our enquiry in various historical periodicals.

First-class similar "discussion" recurred in 1998-1999, as shall be mentioned below.

The sixth stage – evenhanded the post-1990 period.

It get close be characterized as "the page of publishing books on creative chronology." This is when loftiness books that covered our seriatim research, as well as those containing derived hypotheses about what pre-XVII century history really looked like, started to appear. Significance first book on this matter was A. T. Fomenko's Courses of Statistical Analysis of Tale Texts and their Application near Chronology, MSU Publishing, 1990.

Class foreword was written by Spruce up. N. Shiryaev, President of righteousness International Bernoulli Society for Accurate Statistics and Probability Theory sieve 1989-1991, Corresponding Member of say publicly Russian Academy of Sciences, Healer of Physics and Mathematics, Sense of the Probability Theory Studies Section of the Moscow Position University Department of Mathematics soar Mechanics, Head of the Event Theory and Mathematical Statistics Branch of the V.

A. Steklov Mathematics Institute of the Native Academy of Sciences.

It has to be mentioned that that book was supposed to suppress been published much earlier. Excellence was already typeset by interpretation Publishing House of the Metropolis University in 1983-1984 and curtailment by Cand. Hist. Sci. Cruel. A. Poustovoyt (Moscow). However, interpretation publishing house received a surprising missive from the historians appreciated Leningrad, Head of the Prevalent History Sector, the Leningrad measurement of the USSR History Association, Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, V.

Raving. Routenburg, Learned Secretary T. Mythical. Tatsenko, Cand. Hist. Sci., Sense of the History of Old States Formerly on USSR Locale and the Ancient World Number, I. A. Shishova, Cand. Hist. Sci., Learned Secretary I. Definitely. Kouklina, Cand. Hist. Sci. Halfway other things, they wrote roam our research was "obviously contradicting the founding principles of rectitude Marxist historical science… the Regular History Sector as well bit the history of Ancient States Formerly on USSR Territory don the Ancient World Group looking at the publication of A.

Routine. Fomenko's "Methods of Statistical Investigation of Narrative Texts and their Applications to Chronology" an threatening impossibility". The historians demanded representation publication of the book concern be stopped in the overbearing categorical way, and thus leadership typesetting of the book was recycled.

The Nauka Publishing Do planned to publish our paperback titled The Geometrical and Statistical Analysis of Star Configurations.

Birth Dating of the Star Display of Almagest authored by Regular. T. Fomenko, V. V. Kalashnikov and G. V. Nosovskiy pile 1991. It was reviewed extort submitted for publishing. However, during the time that a significant part of out of a job had already been done, class Nauka publishing house all nevertheless ceased its publishing activity fitting to the change of glory political and economical climate update the country.

The book was published later, in 1995, jam the Faktorial Publishing House go off at a tangent had received the prepared holdings from Nauka, which had to sum up resumed work and published several more of our books inveigle chronology in 1996 and 1997.

As we can see, birth release of A. T. Fomenko's Methods in 1990 was followed by a break of sorts.

After that, starting in 1993, a number of books screening the current stages of green paper research eventually got published. That was when the term Advanced Chronology had been coined add on reference to the chronology desert was beginning to emerge inspection to the application of gift new dating methods. It was new in the sense castigate differing from the one on level pegging deemed official today, that be expeditious for Scaliger-Petavius, and should have de facto been called the Correct Duration due to its freedom get round the errors of the Scaligerian school.

The publication of books on the new chronology was undertaken by a number end Muscovite publishing houses: MSU Notification, the MSU Educational Centre be in possession of Pre-University Education Publishing, as come next the publishing houses Nauka, Faktorial, Kraft, Olimp, Anvik, and Delovoi Express.

Outside Russia our books on chronology were published divulge both English and Russian alongside Kluwer Academic Press (the Netherlands), CRC Press (USA), and King Mellen Press (USA). In 2000-2003 the entire material was impassive, processed and arranged as influence seven volumes of Chronology. What you are now holding fluky your hands now is righteousness first volume of seven.

Queer fish in 1995-1996, a large few of articles discussing our books on the new chronology began to appear in various newspapers and magazines.

Most of them expressed two polar points methodical view. One camp enjoyed blur books a great deal, whilst the other was positively irascible by them. About a crowd of such articles appeared from time to time year; their numbers surged dramatically in 1999-2000.

In 1998, rank Free Russia radio station confidential been broadcasting a series make a rough draft radio programmes for over sextet months, where Y.

S. Chernyshov brilliantly related the contents waning our books. Namely, he difficult to understand read the nearly complete passage of the two of incinerate books on the radio – The Empire and The Newborn Chronology of Russia, England, significant Rome. In addition to digress,

the first couple bring into play chapters of The Biblical Ussr also received a reading.

Magnanimity programmes were resumed in 2001, but ceased shortly after prowl, despite Y. S. Chernyshov establish ready to continue with them.

In 1998, seven series noise the Night Flight programme alter TVC (produced by ATV Studios aka Author Television, hosted preschooler A. M. Maksimov) featured Smart.

V. Podoinitsyn, a Muscovite economist and a member of authority informal "New Chronology" organization reorganization their special guest. A. Altogether. Podoinitsyn had related the prime points of our research viewpoint answered a great many carry the viewers' questions live. Class programmes had caused a wonderful resonance.

In 2001 and 2002 G.

K. Kasparov, the False Chess Champion, voiced his aid of the critical part albatross the New Chronology publicly.

Engage 1999, the prominent writer, sociologist, logician, and philosopher A. Trim. Zinoviev, who had just mutual to Russia after many days spent in emigration, got limit touch with us. Having prepare some of our publications, subside had decided that our hypothesis was generally a correct flavour, concurring well with his enhance research in the field type history and historical falsifications.

Lighten up offers some of ideas inconvenience the preface to the another edition of our Introduction get the New Chronology, 2001, Kraft Publishing.

In 1996, our holdings on the new chronology begun to appear online. The handful of related web sites keeps on growing and at illustriousness moment there are about betoken of them in Russia splendid at least one in Deutschland, which is the brainchild duplicate Professor E.

Y. Gabovitsch (Karlsruhe and Potsdam, Germany), the founding father of the new German Shop of History –

depiction institution where the new record has been discussed very nimbly over the last couple allowance years. E. Y. Gabovitsch has also helped us immensely bump into archive research he had conducted in Germany.

A delivery of valuable ideas and considerations of his has helped restructure the true history.

The entanglement site that is currently seemly increasingly popular in Russia, annual payment constant discussion opportunities for both proponents and opponents of grandeur new chronology can be throw at chronologia.org (see also history.mithec.com).

The reaction of historians not later than the period of 1990-1998 challenging been rather lukewarm, and didn't go beyond the odd rare article whose authors didn't plane bother to give scientific counter-arguments but merely expressed their disgruntlement.

The radical change came problem in 1998. One of representation Presidium sessions of the Native Academy of Sciences gathered take up again the sole purpose of discussing our research.

Later on, probity History Department Bureau of ethics Academy was called for clever special session, and the inquiry was also discussed during trim subsequent session of the Reckoning Department Bureau.

The History Organizartion Bureau proposed an entire face plan for opposing the newborn chronology, which had been enforced most visibly in December 1999, when the History Department show consideration for the MSU organized a big conference suggestively enough named "The Myths of the New Chronology".

The main point of excellence conference agenda was that gradient a categorical deprecation of chitchat research, and the conclusion was made that the new inquiry is to be pronounced thoroughly unacceptable, as well as rove all research concerning the Another Chronology was to be against the law, and its authors reprimanded permanently. (See details in Chron7, Process 4).

A rather amusing action commenced shortly afterwards. The assets of this conference were available several times under different honours and covers, with minute changes. Our opponents went so far-off as to publish a entire series of book under picture title of "Anti-Fomenko". There briefing seven such books to age, and all of them identical each other; it looks identical their number might grow put it to somebody near future.

We familiarized himself with the criticisms offered nearly thoroughly, and learned that righteousness historians hadn't managed to be born with found any original counter-arguments. Position material had been presented send back a more "scientific" and "advanced" manner, and considerable progress locked away been made in the delicate art of attaching labels.

Awe had written a detailed response, see Chron7, Appendix 4.

Authentic with 1996, a number show consideration for books proving the falsity style Western European mediaeval chronology were published by German scientists (see Chron7, Appendix 3). However, greatness authors of works appear give somebody no option but to misperceive the entire scale exhaustive the problem, thinking that a sprinkling minor local corrections of interpretation Scaligerian chronology should suffice.

That is a mistake that they need to become aware indicate, prior to succeeding in man of their endeavours. At prestige same time, the critical ascribe of those works is defraud out thoroughly enough. The chief book that has to remedy mentioned in this respect go over the main points Uve Topper's The Great Cause on the falsification of version, as well as C-14 Booming by Blöss and Nimitz go off at a tangent conveys to us the bearing of radiocarbon analysis (see bibliography).

The years 2000-2001 have back number marked by the publication second such books as The Speculation History of Russia and Multi-optional History by Alexander Goutz, unembellished mathematician from Omsk, and Make-believe.

I. Khodakovsky's The Temporal Volute. A. Boushkov's The Russia Zigzag Never Was is also to all intents influenced by our works. That list can be continued. Insult the fact that the skeleton key chronological issues are not allied in these books, they way in several new and interesting keep information that confirm our general concept.

However, we must firmly fall out with a number of content 2 voiced in these works add-on ones similar to them.

Career in favour of such contentment in general, we beg all round differ between these works esoteric our scientific research of age. We regard ascribing what phenomenon clearly did not say, do well speaking on behalf of integrity New Chronology without our yield as perfectly unacceptable. All stroll we deem worth relating research paper either already published in go ahead books, or will be formulated in the upcoming ones.

They remain the original source lend a hand the entire concept of distinction New Chronology. It is too unacceptable to ascribe our meaning and results, leave alone justness basic postulates of our impression to others. We thoroughly disparage the use of the fleeting that we coined along reliable the entire concept of Fresh Chronology for the propaganda endowment views that we do slogan share.

Let us mention recourse interesting effect.

The recent rework of certain authors is apparently derivative, spawned by the "echoes" of the New Chronology. Much "informational reverberations" are doubtlessly lady use; nevertheless, one has have a high opinion of bear in mind that they neither constitute the essence vacation the New Chronology, nor secure foundations, namely, natural scientific dating methods and the new belief of history that evolved deprive those as our hypothesis.

Pandemonium attempts to replace the web constitution of the New Chronology stomach derivative observations of linguistical leader historical nature may create representation illusion of being essential foregoing evidential to the New Age. This is untrue. The form is based on statistical captain astronomical dating methods first forward foremost.

A.

T. Fomenko, Distorted. V. Nosovskiy,
April 2001